You are currently in 5-1/Features  
Print       E-mail      

Movie Review: "Tsotsi"


Published: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:58:00 -0400

Tsotsi/impawards.com
(Image 1 of 1)

For me, the Oscars rarely seem to get it right. More and more, the biggest awards in film seem to go to the heartbreaking dramas without consideration of the uplifting. However, in 2006, the film Tsotsi won the award for Best Foreign Language Film; and finally, the academy awards got it right.

Tsotsi tells the story of a man named David, whose only known name for much of the film is, of course, “Tsotsi,” which apparently means “thug.”  Tsotsi lives in the slums of South Africa, and the film picks up as he and his small gang goes out to do “a job.” They quickly target a rich-looking older man in the train station and follow him into the subway. They surround him, proceed to take his money, and when the man begins to speak one of Tsotsi’s followers stabs him. They strip him of his monetary possessions and leave him dead in the middle of the train. The next scene shows Boston, the least accustomed of the group to violence, throwing up. This adequately introduces us to his character. Later he begins to talk about human decency and how they had gone over the line that night by killing the man. Tsotsi gets angry, beats him senseless, and runs. He runs to the rich part of the city, and sits in the rain looking at the large houses that line the streets. Soon, he sees a car come and pull up to the house directly opposite him. While, the woman steps out of the car to ring the bell for her husband to open the gate, Tsotsi approaches the vehicle, points a gun at the woman, and begins to get in. The woman frantically tries to stop him from pulling away; and in the process, Tsotsi shoots her, seemingly more by accident and fright than malicious intent.

Soon, we see why the woman was so worried. There is a baby in the back of the car.

This event sets into motion a remarkable change in the life of the young man. Later in the film, in one particularly moving scene, he follows a crippled, homeless man along his nightly route in his wheelchair. Upon seeing Tsotsi’s presence, the man asks why he is following him. I won’t waste time by relating the entire conversation, but eventually Tsotsi asks him why he goes on living when he lives like a dog. The man replies that with his hands he can still feel the heat of the sun on the concrete. Through this, he tells Tsotsi that it’s the little things in life that make it worth living. This and many other events work the change that is aforementioned. Without giving away the contents, the ending is a scene that is truly touching. It’s the perfect conclusion to the film.

I love films like this where the main character undergoes a positive change. At the end of the film, Tsotsi learns that there is value in life and that his actions can make a difference. As Christians, we know that true spiritual change can only come from God; and while the film never mentions or even alludes to the presence of a supernatural being, the results in the young man’s life are clearly of God, whether he is a Christian or not.

The entire film is spoken in a foreign language, the exact name of which I haven’t been able to pin down. It seems to be a sort of South African slang hybrid of languages. Therefore, those of us who are not fluent in this language much watch it in subtitles. This, however, unlike some films, does not take away from the story. The quality of the acting allows for comparatively little utilization of dialogue. We see emotion in their faces, not necessarily their words.

The film did earn an R-rating, and this is almost entirely because of the language. The f-word is used frequently during the film, but such coarse language is most likely present in this environment. There are two main instances of violence, neither of which are particularly graphic. A mother is also shown nursing a child but little is revealed.

 

Tsotsi is one of the best films that I’ve seen in a long time. Its use of acting and minimal dialogue lends a certain quality that would not have been present had it been speech-heavy. The final scene almost brought me to tears. I think that speaks more loudly than any words I could use to describe it. It seems there’s finally an award-winning film worth seeing.

 

Print       E-mail